-
Are Most Atheist Organisations Woke?
Whereas the Atheists For Liberty team have been loudly proclaiming that they are the only “non-woke” atheist organisation, in fact their position is not at all exceptional.
-
Atheist Anti-Woke Warriors Who Only Fight When It Suits
While Thomas Sheedy as President of Atheists For Liberty is currently attacking the Freedom From Religion Foundation, consistent with his track record it’s only a matter of time before he accepts their secular blasphemy policy.
-
Sacrificing Women’s Safety To A Solipsistic Ideology
The news this week about Imane Khelif reminds me of the exchange illustrated here, which I believe describes a large part of the ideology that created this mess.
-
In Defence Of Purity Tests
After I wrote an article opposing the most tribal ideological purity tests, I received some arguments describing why such censorious behaviour is really great, actually.
-
The Most Tedious Purity Tests
The most dull and tiresome purity test applied by far-left extremists (including atheists who claim to favour enlightenment free-thought values) are those that condemn people not for what they have done or said, but for who they have spoken with.
-
The Secret Principal Officer Of AAI
AAI is either lying to the IRS or else lying to their members about who is actually running the organisation, and it is not clear which of these two possibilities is worse.
-
The Irish Catholic And Their Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad “Journalism”
Not alone has an entirely appalling and utterly false allegation been made by The Irish Catholic newspaper, but they have also refused to correct the fiction that they invented out of think air.
-
Eoghan Corry Is Very Wrong
Not alone did Eoghan Corry get almost everything wrong when he reported on national radio about the “Blessing Of The Planes”, he managed to be consistently wrong in the same direction.
-
Fool Me Once …
The Office of the Information Commissioner has published a series of false conclusions on the same topic, with each subsequent “formal legally binding decision” contradicting the previous one. Since they remain sanguine about these false conclusions, how can their next decision on the topic have any credibility?